AI for Software Engineers: Concepts and Techniques

Course 1851

  • Duration: 3 days
  • Language: English
  • Level: Intermediate

This three-day intensive course is designed to equip software engineers, project managers, and technical leads with the tools and insights needed to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) effectively. By focusing on AI concepts, practical implementations, and ethical considerations, participants will enhance their ability to integrate AI into modern software projects.

AI for Software Engineers: Concepts & Techniques Delivery Methods

  • In-Person

  • Online

  • Upskill your whole team by bringing Private Team Training to your facility.

AI for Software Engineers: Concepts & Techniques Information

Course Benefits

  • Foundation: Understand core AI concepts and their integration with software engineering.
  • Practical Tools: Use AI tools for testing, debugging, and project management.
  • Ethics: Explore responsible and ethical AI practices.
  • Hands-On: Apply concepts through practical labs addressing real-world challenges

Prerequisites:

  • Proficiency in Python
  • Familiarity with SDLC fundamentals (version control, CI/CD, agile methodology)

AI for Software Engineers: Concepts & Techniques Training Outline

Day 1: AI Foundations and Basic ML Concepts

Module 1: Introduction to AI in Software Development

  • AI vs. Conventional Systems
    • Narrow, General, and Super AI
    • AI hardware (GPUs, TPUs) and popular frameworks
  • AI in the SDLC
    • Benefits (automation, predictive insights) and risks (maintenance, data quality)
    • AI as a Service (AIaaS) and service contracts

Module 2: Quality Characteristics and Ethics in AI

  • Key Quality Factors
    • Flexibility, Adaptability, Autonomy
    • Transparency & Explainability
  • Ethical & Regulatory
    • Bias, Reward Hacking, and compliance (e.g., GDPR)
  • Risk Management
    • Identifying and mitigating biases
    • Documentation of AI components

Module 3: Machine Learning Overview

  • ML Types
    • Supervised, Unsupervised, Reinforcement Learning
  • ML Workflow
    • Data collection, preprocessing, model training, evaluation, deployment
  • Overfitting & Underfitting
    • Causes, detection, and mitigation (e.g., regularization)

Lab 1: Overfitting & Underfitting (Titanic Dataset)

  • Scenario: Predict passenger survival on the Titanic.
  • Goal: Demonstrate how model complexity influences performance.
  • Lab Steps:
    1. Load and preprocess Titanic data.
    2. Train multiple classifiers (e.g., logistic regression vs. random forest).
    3. Observe overfitting/underfitting effects on validation accuracy.

Day 2: Data Handling, Regression, and Prompt Engineering

Module 4: Data Preparation & Handling

  • Data Quality
    • Cleaning, handling missing values, outliers, categorical features
    • Train/validation/test splits
  • Common Pitfalls
    • Imbalanced classes, mislabeled data, domain knowledge gaps

Lab 2: Data Preparation (NYC Taxi Dataset)

  • Scenario: Forecast taxi fares in NYC (regression).
  • Goal: Clean a real-world dataset and create meaningful features.
  • Lab Steps:
    1. Load NYC Yellow Cab data (pickup/dropoff times, distances).
    2. Handle missing data and detect outliers.
    3. Engineer features (e.g., time-of-day, trip distance).

Module 5: Model Evaluation Metrics

  • Regression Metrics
    • MSE, RMSE, MAE, R²
  • Classification Recap
    • Accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrix
  • Choosing the Right Metric
    • Contextual needs (business value, safety-critical)

Lab 3: Regression Modeling (NYC Taxi Fares)

  • Scenario: Build and evaluate models to predict fare amounts.
  • Goal: Compare linear regression vs. gradient boosting to measure error rates.
  • Lab Steps:
    1. Train at least two regression models on NYC Taxi data.
    2. Compute MSE, RMSE, and MAE on the validation set.
    3. Discuss feature importance and next steps.

Module 6: Prompt Engineering for Generative AI

  • Prompting Best Practices
    • Role-based prompting, zero-shot vs. few-shot, chain-of-thought reasoning
    • Structuring prompts for clarity, constraints, and context
    • Iterative refinement (synonyms, repeated keywords, output format)

Lab 4: Designing a Sophisticated Prompt for Software Engineering

  • Scenario: Generate detailed, actionable advice on software architecture, testing, or refactoring in a microservices environment.
  • Goal: Apply advanced prompting techniques (role prompting, constraints, few-shot examples) to create a high-quality prompt that yields expert-level recommendations.
  • Lab Steps:
    1. Define Context & Role (e.g., “You are a principal software architect…”).
    2. Provide Examples (show how you want the answer structured or styled).
    3. Add Constraints (limit response length, include specific bullet points).
    4. Iterate & Refine (test and adjust wording for clarity & precision).

Day 3: Neural Networks, Explainability, and Responsible AI

Module 7: Neural Networks Introduction

  • NN Basics
    • Perceptrons, hidden layers, activation functions
  • NN Use Cases
    • Images, text, speech; large-scale data
  • Testing Neural Networks
    • Special considerations, coverage measures

Lab 5: Neural Network Classification (MNIST)

  • Scenario: Classify handwritten digits from MNIST.
  • Goal: Implement and train a feed-forward neural network.
  • Lab Steps:
    1. Load MNIST images (28x28).
    2. Build a simple network (e.g., feed-forward).
    3. Evaluate accuracy and discuss improvements (layers, dropout, etc.).

Module 8: Testing & Model Explainability

  • Levels of Testing
    • Input data testing, model testing, system & acceptance testing
  • Adversarial Attacks & Data Poisoning
    • Defenses, monitoring strategies
  • Explainability Methods
    • LIME, SHAP, local vs. global interpretation

Lab 6: Model Explainability (U.S. Housing with LIME)

  • Scenario: Stakeholders want insights into house pricing predictions.
  • Goal: Use LIME to explain predictions of a regression model.
  • Lab Steps:
    1. Train a regression model on a U.S. housing dataset (e.g., Ames Housing).
    2. Apply LIME to interpret specific predictions.
    3. Identify potential biases or anomalies in model behavior.

Module 9: Responsible AI & Wrap-Up

  • Governance & Compliance
    • Privacy, fairness, disclaimers, accountability
  • Future Trends
    • Large Language Models (LLMs), multi-modal AI, MLOps
  • Key Takeaways
    • Data and model versioning, transparency, bias mitigation, robust QA

Summary of Labs

  1. Lab 1: Overfitting & Underfitting (Titanic)
  2. Lab 2: Data Preparation (NYC Taxi)
  3. Lab 3: Regression Modeling (NYC Taxi Fares)
  4. Lab 4: Designing a Sophisticated Prompt for Software Engineering (GenAI)
  5. Lab 5: Neural Network Classification (MNIST)
  6. Lab 6: Model Explainability (U.S. Housing with LIME)

Need Help Finding The Right Training Solution?

Our training advisors are here for you.

AI for Software Engineers: Concepts & Techniques

AI enhances the SDLC by automating repetitive tasks, providing predictive insights, and improving efficiency. However, it also introduces risks such as increased maintenance complexity, reliance on high-quality data, and potential bias in decision-making. AI as a Service (AIaaS) solutions can help mitigate some risks but require careful service contract management.

Ensuring fairness in AI models involves multiple strategies, including identifying and mitigating biases during data preparation, documenting AI components, and using explainability techniques like LIME and SHAP. Ethical considerations, such as compliance with regulations like GDPR, also play a critical role in responsible AI development.

Effective AI prompts should be structured with clear roles, constraints, and examples. Best practices include using role-based prompting (e.g., “You are a principal software architect…”), employing zero-shot or few-shot learning, and iteratively refining prompts to improve clarity and output quality. Adding specific constraints, such as response length and formatting, can enhance the usefulness of AI-generated answers.